Scoping · the outcome, made measurable
By 2035, keep plastic packaging in safe, continuous circulation — cheaper than virgin plastic, powered entirely by renewable energy, net-negative in greenhouse gases, and removing legacy plastic and toxic chemicals from the environment.
Current local maximum
Today’s systems recycle selected, sorted plastics through energy-intensive processes that lose material quality, value and carbon with each cycle.
Can high-barrier food packaging be kinetically stable throughout manufacture and use, yet thermodynamically recoverable as polymer-grade feedstock through a selective trigger absent from the supply chain?
Standing
11 of 15 rows already carry a result — and 3 carry nothing at all
A scorecard whose rows are all green is a sales document. This one reports its empty rows in the same place as its full ones, and separates a bound — true of any material obeying the stated physics — from a measurement, which is true of one run.
Zero avoidable experimentation · specification §21
The specification asks for metrics on experiments performed despite sufficient prior evidence. The most direct way to avoid an experiment is to prove in advance that it cannot succeed. All 7 derived rows do exactly that — each removes, narrows or reorders a planned experiment before any material is made.
The scorecard
Every outcome, its threshold, and whether anything answers it yet
Open a row to see the standing result, the functions that produce it, and — for a derived bound — what it changes about the plan. A test asserts every function named here is really exported, so a row cannot keep quoting a number after the code beneath it moves.
A closed-form bound. True of any material obeying the stated physics.
The duty cycle demands 10^6.08 selectivity; a purely thermal trigger can supply 10^1.96. The 4.12-order deficit is independent of activation energy — Ea cancels out of the ratio entirely — so no catalyst choice closes it. Thermal-only closure would need a 133.5 °C wash.
What this removes from the plan
Year-1 experiment 2 should not screen thermal triggers at all. It should measure the chemical contrast a second variable supplies, because that is the only term left.
computed by
requiredSelectivityOrdersthermalSelectivityCeilingOrdersselectivityCeilingthermalClosureTemperatureCIf hydroxide supplies the missing contrast, the wash must run at pH 11.12 or above. That figure is polymer-independent: it follows from the duty cycle and the order of the reaction in hydroxide, not from any particular backbone.
What this removes from the plan
Fixes the wash pH before any polymer is synthesised, and makes food-contact and alkali-stability screening a first-year question rather than a later surprise.
computed by
minimumWashPHCAUSTIC_WASH_PHThe catalysed linkage must carry at least 58.2 kJ/mol of activation energy to survive the melt residence budget. Together with the 106.6 kJ/mol ceiling above which the wash cannot act, this leaves a genuine but narrow window — and the extruder is its severest leg.
What this removes from the plan
Turns "does it extrude" into a pass/fail on a measured activation energy, obtainable by TGA on grams of material rather than by a converting trial on kilograms.
computed by
catalyticBurdenminimumProcessingBarriermaxFeasibleActivationEnergyBarrier improvement is capped at roughly 27× the amorphous value once crystallinity is held below what recovery tolerates. The cap is structural: crystallinity and comonomer content are interchangeable through f_eff = f(1−χ), so barrier bought by crystallising is paid for in recoverable fraction.
What this removes from the plan
Year-1 experiment 1 can compute its own kill criterion before the first film is cast: if the incumbent needs more than the cap, the material family is rejected on paper.
computed by
maxBarrierAtRecoveryLimitcrystallinityCeilingForRecoveryeffectiveCleavableFractionrelativePermeabilityA loop that loses nothing concentrates everything. At 99.9% recovery the steady-state impurity level is 1000× the per-cycle input — the better the yield, the worse the accumulation, which inverts the intuition the target is written with.
What this removes from the plan
A five-cycle demonstration is a trap: it reports a small fraction of the steady state and reads as success. The number of cycles needed is itself computable and should be stated in the protocol before the loop is run.
computed by
purgeConcentrationFactorsteadyStateImpuritycyclesToSteadyStateTwo published routes differ in sign. Ring-opened polyester nets +2 electrons per repeat unit; melt-grafted polyethylene nets −0.28 and so consumes more than it returns. The discriminator is whether the culture can eat the fragment, not what the cutting costs.
What this removes from the plan
Removes coulombic-efficiency optimisation from the critical path. No efficiency rescues a fragment with zero bioavailability, so the first measurement is edibility.
computed by
netElectronsPerRepeatUnitcutCostAsFractionOfContentPUBLISHED_ROUTESbreakEvenCoulombicEfficiencyThe joint screen takes eight inputs and returns a verdict only when all are present, refusing to score a candidate on a subset. Constraints that are individually satisfiable are jointly binding through shared variables — crystallinity appears in three of them.
What this removes from the plan
Screening order stops being arbitrary: the constraint that binds hardest is evaluated first, and candidates die on paper in the cheapest possible order.
computed by
assessFeasibilityevaluateCandidatecandidateFromEvidencescreenCorpus
The metric bank
77 metrics across 12 categories — and only 47% of them can be computed
The specification’s nanomaterials track lists its metrics without saying who could produce them. Each one here carries a provenance instead, and the resulting figure is deliberately unflattering: 24 of these must be measured on real film, and 17 have no stated method at all. The derived bounds do not replace those measurements — they decide which film is worth making.
Read the column of coverage bars top to bottom and the shape of the programme appears. The categories with the most computed metrics are the ones where physics supplies a bound. Energy, carbon and cost — the clause the whole 2035 outcome is judged on — has none.
Whether carbon actually returns, and what accumulates when it does.
- Monomer yield per cycle (%)
- Mass loss per cycle (%)
- Steady-state impurity concentration factor (×)
purgeConcentrationFactor - Cycles to reach a stated fraction of steady state
cyclesToSteadyState - Whether a proposed cycle count is informative or a trap
assessCycleTest - Molecular-weight retention across loops
- Catalyst recovery fraction per cycle (%)
- Purge stream volume and its disposal route
The contrast between conditions of use and conditions of recovery.
- Selectivity orders demanded by the duty cycle
requiredSelectivityOrders - Selectivity orders a thermal trigger can supply
thermalSelectivityCeilingOrders - Minimum wash pH for hydroxide to close the deficit
minimumWashPH - Wash temperature at which thermal contrast alone would suffice
thermalClosureTemperatureC - Per-mechanism contribution to the achieved contrast
selectivityLedger - Measured shelf-life molecular-weight loss (%)
- Measured monomer release within the recovery window (%)
- Selectivity orders demanded by the duty cycle
The extruder is the severest thermal leg the material ever sees.
- Activation energy the linkage must carry to survive the melt
catalyticBurden - Upper activation energy above which the wash cannot act
maxFeasibleActivationEnergy - Activation energy inferred from a thermogravimetric ramp
activationEnergyFromTga - Maximum processing temperature the window permits
maxProcessingTemperatureC - Melt strength and converting window
- Residual monomer after extrusion (ppm)
- Activation energy the linkage must carry to survive the melt
Parity with the incumbent, which is the only bar that matters commercially.
- Barrier improvement ceiling at the recovery limit (×)
maxBarrierAtRecoveryLimit - Crystallinity ceiling that recovery tolerates
crystallinityCeilingForRecovery - Relative permeability from morphology (Nielsen tortuosity)
relativePermeability - Glass transition of a candidate composition
foxGlassTransition - Oxygen and water-vapour transmission rate
- Heat-seal initiation, hot tack, seal integrity
- Tear, puncture and flex-crack durability
- Haze, odour, colour and their drift on ageing
- 90 °C hot-fill retention
- Barrier improvement ceiling at the recovery limit (×)
Removing sorting is the clause that separates this from existing recycling.
- Monomer yield from printed, food-contaminated film (%)
- Purification energy per kilogram of monomer
- Solvent demand and recovery fraction
- Purification efficiency required to hold the loop
requiredPurificationEfficiency - Selectivity against non-target polymers in the same stream
- Tolerance to adhesives, inks, labels and closures
Where the physics forbids a target outright. The cheapest result a programme can get.
- Whether a thermal trigger alone can ever close the duty cycle
selectivityCeiling - Joint feasibility across all eight design inputs at once
assessFeasibility - Feasible activation-energy window, and whether it is empty
feasibleBarrierWindow - Minimum cleavable fraction for monomer-dominated products
minimumCleavableFractionForMonomer - Fragment floor imposed by chain architecture
accessibleFragmentFloorDp - Sign of the electron balance for a valorisation route
netElectronsPerRepeatUnit
- Whether a thermal trigger alone can ever close the duty cycle
Whether a computed number is fit to make a decision with.
- Error on an anchored polymerisation enthalpy (kJ/mol)
SOLVATION_CORRECTION - Error correlation ρ across a ring-opening
CORRECTED_CALIBRATION - Enthalpy error propagated to a ceiling temperature (K)
ceilingTemperatureErrorK - Per-atom accuracy a target error would demand
requiredPerAtomAccuracyMeV - Which design inputs atomistic simulation can reach at all
reachSummary - Prediction interval coverage against held-out measurements
- Accuracy on monomer families outside the training set
- Error on an anchored polymerisation enthalpy (kJ/mol)
Specification §21 — experiments performed despite sufficient prior evidence.
- Planned experiments removed or narrowed by a derived bound
experimentsChanged - Candidates rejected on paper before synthesis
screenCorpus - Constraint that binds hardest, setting the screening order
evaluateCandidate - Repeated-dead-end rate across the programme
- Fraction of experiments selected with quantified expected information gain
- Percentage of failed experiments producing reusable information
- Planned experiments removed or narrowed by a derived bound
A claim without a grade is a claim that cannot be checked.
- Sources carrying a DOI and a content hash
SOURCES - Specification claims graded on the evidence ladder
ALIGNMENT - Grade of a derived result, capped at its weakest input
weakestGrade - Fraction of claims resting on a single source
- Capture rate for failures and anomalies
- Sources carrying a DOI and a content hash
Food contact is a regulatory gate, not a performance metric.
- Migrated fraction of a mobile species over shelf life
migratedFraction - Migration in parts per billion against a stated limit
migrationPpb - Residual catalyst, oligomer and degradation products
- Migration after repeated loops, not only first use
- Substances of concern designed out rather than diluted
- Environmental fate of unrecovered material
- Migrated fraction of a mobile species over shelf life
The clause the whole outcome is judged on, and the least instrumented here.
- Total cost per use, including collection and capital
- Energy per kilogram of recovered monomer
- Greenhouse-gas balance without offsets
- Renewable fraction of process energy
- Cost per use versus virgin at matched performance
- Capital intensity per tonne of annual capacity
Whether anything demonstrated survives leaving the bench.
- Functional retention at ≥100× production scale (%)
- Independent reproduction rate within stated uncertainty (%)
- Laboratory-to-pilot time
- Converting-line compatibility on existing equipment
- Freedom to operate and licensing position
Year one
Three decisive experiments, each with its kill criterion partly pre-computed
Every one of the three has a bound waiting for it. That does not make the experiments unnecessary — it says which measurement in each still carries information, so the run is designed around that rather than around a variable already known to be inert.
Film feasibility
Measures
- Oxygen and water-vapour transmission at defined temperature and humidity
- Heat-seal initiation, hot tack and seal integrity
- Tear, puncture and flex-crack durability
- Haze, odour and ageing
Bound in hand before the run
Barrier improvement cannot exceed roughly 27× the amorphous value while crystallinity stays below what recovery tolerates. If the incumbent requirement sits above that, the kill criterion is already met and no film needs casting.
Kill criterion
Reject or redesign the material family if no candidate approaches minimum shelf-life and converting requirements without an incompatible barrier layer.
Still carries information
The amorphous baseline permeability of the actual backbone — the one term the cap is expressed relative to, and the one no calculation here supplies.
Trigger orthogonality
Measures
- Molecular-weight retention after accelerated shelf-life exposure
- Mechanical performance after the same exposure
- Depolymerisation rate and monomer yield under the recovery trigger
Bound in hand before the run
For a purely thermal trigger the criterion is met in advance: the duty cycle demands 10^6.08 selectivity and temperature alone supplies 10^1.96, a deficit of 4.12 orders that is independent of activation energy. Screening thermal triggers cannot succeed.
Kill criterion
Reject the trigger–polymer combination if fast recovery intrinsically causes unacceptable storage or processing instability.
Still carries information
How much contrast a second, chemical variable actually supplies on this backbone — and whether the material tolerates the pH 11.12 wash that hydroxide would require.
Dirty-waste circularity
Measures
- Isolated polymer-grade monomer yield from printed, food-contaminated film
- Purification energy and solvent demand
- Catalyst recovery and impurity accumulation
- Molecular weight and mechanical retention over repeated cycles
- Migration-relevant contaminants
Bound in hand before the run
The cycle count matters more than the yield. At 99.9% recovery, impurities reach 1000× their per-cycle input at steady state, and a short demonstration reports a small fraction of that — so a five-cycle run can pass while the real loop fails.
Kill criterion
Reject the process if purification — not depolymerisation — makes recovery environmentally or economically inferior to the incumbent pathway.
Still carries information
The per-cycle impurity input from a genuinely contaminated feed, which sets how many cycles the demonstration must actually run to be informative.
Obligations
Six clauses, each paired with the quantity that would settle it
The specification states the clauses. The pairing is what turns each from an intention into something a reviewer can check.
| We must | Measured how |
|---|---|
| Return recovered carbon to virgin-specification monomer without downcycling. | Monomer purity (%) and mass loss per cycle (%), over consecutive loops. |
| Make circular packaging cheaper per use than virgin packaging. | Total cost per use (currency/use) including collection, cleaning and capital. |
| Remove sorting as a condition for recovery. | Monomer yield (%) from mixed, printed, food-contaminated film. |
| Make recovery mild, selective and lossless — no cracking, pyrolysis, char or fuel. | Selectivity ratio between recovery and shelf conditions (dimensionless). |
| Remove the performance and safety penalties. | OTR/WVTR, seal strength, 90 °C hot-fill retention, migration (ppb). |
| Independently verify mass, carbon, energy, migration, yield and performance. | Cycles independently reproduced, and the number of loops actually run. |