Microbial electrochemical systems · research intelligence

From the literature
to a reactor you
can reason about.

MESSAI unifies a curated microbial-electrochemistry corpus, a parameter graph built on domain consensus, and calibrated prior intervals — so you can discover what’s known, design a reactor in 3D, and see literature-based performance ranges with their conditions and limits.

Live 3D · Drag to rotate · dual-chamber microbial electrolysis cell

What researchers can do here

One platform, from paper to checkable estimate

Every surface reads from the same curated corpus and the same prior stack — so what you discover, analyze, and estimate all trace back to source.

How it works

From a raw PDF to an estimate with a measured interval

The same pipeline feeds every surface. Each stage is auditable — you can trace any number on the platform back through calibration, canonicalization, and extraction to the paper it came from.

  1. 1

    Corpus

    19,000+ MES papers in the corpus, with full-text PDFs content-addressed and embedded for semantic retrieval.

  2. 2

    Extraction

    Two-tier LLM extraction pulls measurements with their conditions. Every value keeps its DOI, and about half keep a source snippet.

  3. 3

    Canonicalization

    Raw values are normalized to SI and mapped to canonical parameters, so numbers from different papers become comparable.

  4. 4

    Priors & calibration

    Hierarchical Bayesian priors (PyMC, log-normal) per system class, wrapped in conformal intervals with measured coverage.

  5. 5

    Prediction

    Per-physics-family predictors return every output as {value, unit, ci_low, ci_high, confidence, source}. Interval fields are filled where a calibrated interval exists.

  6. 6

    3D lab

    Design a reactor and see the prediction, the empirical evidence behind it, and the mechanistic loss decomposition side by side.

What the platform does

1101001k10kAREAL POWER DENSITY · mW/m²180 mW/m²95% CI 14–2301SCHEMATIC · LOG-NORMAL

Calibrated intervals

Intervals are shown where they are calibrated

Literature measurements are normalised to SI, pooled into a hierarchical log-normal prior per system class, and wrapped in conformal intervals with measured coverage where calibration exists. You get an interval, not folklore.

  • Outputs ship as {value, unit, ci_low, ci_high, confidence, source}
  • Intervals are wide where the corpus is wide — power-density CoV is ~1,285%
  • Coverage is measured on held-out observations, not assumed
  • Insufficient inputs return insufficient_inputs, never a fabricated default
See the methodology →
TemperaturepHHRTSubstrate conc.COD removalCurrent densityCoulombic eff.Power densityH₂ yieldMECHANISTICCORRELATIONAL

Causal structure

Typed edges, not a hairball

Parameters are linked in a directed acyclic graph. Each edge is labelled by how it was established — derived from physics, taken from domain consensus, or corroborated by co-observation in the corpus. Almost all rest on domain consensus, and none is established as causal.

  • Mechanistic edges come from the electrochemistry, not from the data
  • Correlational edges carry their co-observation count and support
  • The graph is acyclic by construction and enforced in tests
  • Co-observed edges resolve to papers; mechanistic edges cite their derivation
Explore the graph →

Open by default

Nine open packages (one still scaffolding)

The data and tooling that power MESSAI are released as standalone, citable packages — each with a schema, a license, and a CITATION.cff. Use them in your own analysis; they don’t depend on the platform.

New to the packages? Start with the manual or read how the parameter package is consumed downstream.

Two front doors · one platform

Built for operators and researchers

If you operate a waste stream

See what MES can recover from your effluent

  • Pick a waste stream → see estimated recovery

    Six industrial archetypes + custom influent characterisation. Live estimates with a 95% interval where the prior supports one.

  • Honest TEA + LCA per archetype

    CapEx, OpEx, LCOE, LCO-water scaled with flow. GWP + fossil energy from peer-reviewed baselines.

  • 5-physics-family routing

    MFC / MEC / MDC / MES / MNRC / MMRC / MBES auto-routed by influent characteristics.

If you research MES

A curated corpus and a tested ML stack

  • 19,000+ papers · 214,682 measurements

    Two-tier extraction (paper header + per-measurement conditions). Every row carries its DOI; about half carry a source snippet.

  • 835 canonical parameters, FK-linked DAG

    2,792 directed edges (snapshot of 22 Jul 2026): 2,721 rest on domain consensus, 11 are corroborated by corpus co-occurrence, none is established as causal. Multi-axis taxonomy (17 primary types × subtypes × combinations).

  • Per-class priors with measured interval coverage

    Hierarchical priors (PyMC NUTS, v2): the 95% intervals cover 96.1% of 5,269 held-out values from 339 papers, scored 28 Oct 2026. That is interval coverage, not point accuracy.

Get started

Bring a research question.
Leave with the evidence, its conditions and a calibrated range where one is supported.

Search the corpus, design a reactor, and read literature-based ranges that name their sources, their conditions and where no calibrated range exists.