Microbial electrochemical systems · research intelligence
From the literature to a reactor you can reason about.
MESSAI unifies a curated microbial-electrochemistry corpus, a parameter graph built on domain consensus, and calibrated prior intervals — so you can discover what’s known, design a reactor in 3D, and see literature-based performance ranges with their conditions and limits.
From a raw PDF to an estimate with a measured interval
The same pipeline feeds every surface. Each stage is auditable — you can trace any number on the platform back through calibration, canonicalization, and extraction to the paper it came from.
1
Corpus
19,000+ MES papers in the corpus, with full-text PDFs content-addressed and embedded for semantic retrieval.
2
Extraction
Two-tier LLM extraction pulls measurements with their conditions. Every value keeps its DOI, and about half keep a source snippet.
3
Canonicalization
Raw values are normalized to SI and mapped to canonical parameters, so numbers from different papers become comparable.
4
Priors & calibration
Hierarchical Bayesian priors (PyMC, log-normal) per system class, wrapped in conformal intervals with measured coverage.
5
Prediction
Per-physics-family predictors return every output as {value, unit, ci_low, ci_high, confidence, source}. Interval fields are filled where a calibrated interval exists.
6
3D lab
Design a reactor and see the prediction, the empirical evidence behind it, and the mechanistic loss decomposition side by side.
What the platform does
Calibrated intervals
Intervals are shown where they are calibrated
Literature measurements are normalised to SI, pooled into a hierarchical log-normal prior per system class, and wrapped in conformal intervals with measured coverage where calibration exists. You get an interval, not folklore.
Outputs ship as {value, unit, ci_low, ci_high, confidence, source}
Intervals are wide where the corpus is wide — power-density CoV is ~1,285%
Coverage is measured on held-out observations, not assumed
Insufficient inputs return insufficient_inputs, never a fabricated default
Parameters are linked in a directed acyclic graph. Each edge is labelled by how it was established — derived from physics, taken from domain consensus, or corroborated by co-observation in the corpus. Almost all rest on domain consensus, and none is established as causal.
Mechanistic edges come from the electrochemistry, not from the data
Correlational edges carry their co-observation count and support
The graph is acyclic by construction and enforced in tests
Co-observed edges resolve to papers; mechanistic edges cite their derivation
The data and tooling that power MESSAI are released as standalone, citable packages — each with a schema, a license, and a CITATION.cff. Use them in your own analysis; they don’t depend on the platform.
Two-tier extraction (paper header + per-measurement conditions). Every row carries its DOI; about half carry a source snippet.
835 canonical parameters, FK-linked DAG
2,792 directed edges (snapshot of 22 Jul 2026): 2,721 rest on domain consensus, 11 are corroborated by corpus co-occurrence, none is established as causal. Multi-axis taxonomy (17 primary types × subtypes × combinations).
Per-class priors with measured interval coverage
Hierarchical priors (PyMC NUTS, v2): the 95% intervals cover 96.1% of 5,269 held-out values from 339 papers, scored 28 Oct 2026. That is interval coverage, not point accuracy.