Effects of Temperature and Calciums on the Treatment of Organics and Nutrient in Swine Wastewater Using an Integrated Bioelectrochemical Ion-Exchange System
Seung Joo Lim, Tak-Hyun Kim
AI summary
90% confidenceBES research focusing on membrane, wastewater, substrate. Introduction Since husbandry industry has intensively developed, a great amount of high-strength swine wastewater has been generated. Even though several invest...
Generated by MESSAI extraction pipeline · review against source PDF
No 3D model is mapped to this paper yet. Parameter ranges above still place reported values on the literature distribution.
Abstract
Introduction Since husbandry industry has intensively developed, a great amount of high-strength swine wastewater has been generated. Even though several investigators have developed various processes for the treatment of swine wastewater, it was continuously required to develop more stable process high-strength wastewater. The objective of this paper was to investigate simultaneous removal of organic matter and nutrient in swine wastewater using an ion-exchange membrane system. Materials and Methods The ion-exchange membrane system consisted of three chamber (A, B and C) was separated by a cationic exchange membrane and an anionic exchange membrane(Figure 1). Ammonium ion in swine wastewater was ion-exchanged between a chamber A and a chamber B via a CEM. The ammonium ion was biologically oxidized to nitrate in a chamber B and nitrate was transported via an AEM and denitrified in a chamber C. Organic matter in the influent was acidified in a chamber A and used as electron donor for denitrification in a chamber C. COD, ammonia and phosphate used in this study were 9080.4 mg/L, 1910.6 mg/L and 43.2 mg/L. Results and Discussion Maximum COD and ammonia removal efficiencies were 86.4% and 78.4%. Average COD and ammonia removal were 77.1% and 63.6% in Figure 2. When temperature sharply decreased to 13°C, the ammonia removal efficiency maintained about 42.0% due to the high ammonium flux (1.54 mg N/m²/sec) and MLVSS ratio (0.83) in Figure 2. As shown in Figure 3, the maximum phosphate removal efficiency was 91.0% (Ave.: 59.7%), and the phosphate removal was highly correlated with calcium consumption. This shows that phosphorus can be removed as a Ca3(PO4)2 or the coprecipitation of phosphate with calcite. Figure 1
Keywords
Identifiers
- Journal
- ECS Meeting Abstracts
- Year
- 2016