Competition of two highly specialized and efficient acetoclastic electroactive bacteria for acetate in biofilm anode of microbial electrolysis cell
Veerraghavulu Sapireddy, Krishna P. Katuri, Ali Muhammad, Pascal E. Saikaly
AI summary
70% confidenceThis MEC study abstractMaintaining functional stability of microbial electrolysis cell (MEC) treating wastewater depends on maintaining functional redundancy of efficient electroactive bacteria (EAB) on the anode biofilm. Therefore, investigating whether efficient EAB competing for the same resources (electron donor and acceptor) co-exist at the anode biofilm is key for the successful application of MEC for wastewater treatment.
Generated by MESSAI extraction pipeline · review against source PDF
Reported parameters
No extracted parameters yet — request AI extraction to compare this paper against literature distributions.
Open in lab for full controls, parameter editing, and template overlays.
Open in lab →What they did
- System
- MEC
- Substrate
- pure compound
What worked
No outcome metrics extracted yet.
Abstract
AbstractMaintaining functional stability of microbial electrolysis cell (MEC) treating wastewater depends on maintaining functional redundancy of efficient electroactive bacteria (EAB) on the anode biofilm. Therefore, investigating whether efficient EAB competing for the same resources (electron donor and acceptor) co-exist at the anode biofilm is key for the successful application of MEC for wastewater treatment. Here, we compare the electrochemical and kinetic properties of two efficient acetoclastic EAB, Geobacter sulfurreducens (GS) and Desulfuromonas acetexigens (DA), grown as monoculture in MECs fed with acetate. Additionally, we monitor the evolution of DA and GS in co-culture MECs fed with acetate or domestic wastewater using fluorescent in situ hybridization. The apparent Monod kinetic parameters reveal that DA possesses higher jmax (10.7 ± 0.4 A/m2) and lower KS, app (2 ± 0.15 mM) compared to GS biofilms (jmax: 9.6 ± 0.2 A/m2 and KS, app: 2.9 ± 0.2 mM). Further, more donor electrons are diverted to the anode for respiration in DA compared to GS. In acetate-fed co-culture MECs, DA (98% abundance) outcompete GS for anode-dependent growth. In contrast, both EAB co-exist (DA: 55 ± 2%; GS: 24 ± 1.1%) in wastewater-fed co-culture MECs despite the advantage of DA over GS based on kinetic parameters alone. The co-existence of efficient acetoclastic EAB with high current density in MECs fed with wastewater is significant in the context of functional redundancy to maintain stable performance. Our findings also provide insight to future studies on bioaugmentation of wastewater-fed MECs with efficient EAB to enhance performance.
Key findings
- 4 A/m2) and lower KS, app (2 ± 0.
- 2 A/m2 and KS, app: 2.
- In acetate-fed co-culture MECs, DA (98% abundance) outcompete GS for anode-dependent growth.
- In contrast, both EAB co-exist (DA: 55 ± 2%; GS: 24 ± 1.
- 1%) in wastewater-fed co-culture MECs despite the advantage of DA over GS based on kinetic parameters alone.
Keywords
Identifiers
- Journal
- npj Biofilms and Microbiomes
- Year
- 2021