Generic MFCRepresentative model
Click to animate flow
loading 3D model…

Representative MFC — matched on the paper’s system type only, not its reactor or geometry.

Extraction

Reported parameters

No values extracted from this paper yet.

Open in lab for full controls, parameter editing, and template overlays.

Open in lab →

What they did

System
MFC

What worked

No outcome metrics extracted yet.

Abstract

The study presents the comparative bioelectrochemical treatment of phenol in anodic and cathodic compartments of four identical dual chambered microbial fuel cells (MFCs) with bare and multiwalled carbon nanotube/polypyrrole (MWCNT/PPy)-coated electrodes, respectively. It was observed that systems performing biocathodic treatment of phenol performed better as compared to the systems performing bioanodic treatment. The maximum power densities for bioanodic phenol treatment using bare and coated electrodes were found to be 469.038 and 560.719 mW/m 2 , while for biocathodic treatment, they were observed to be 604.804 and 650.557 mW/m 2 , respectively. The MFCs performing biocathodic treatment of phenol consistently showed higher chemical oxygen demand removal efficiency, Coulombic efficiency, and power density and indicated the better performance of the biocathodic bare (B-MFC) and coated (C-MFC) MFCs as compared to the bioanodic B-MFC and C-MFC. UV/vis spectrophotometry revealed that the MWCNT/PPy-coated carbon paper worked significantly better in the treatment of phenol with admirable treatment obtained within a week of the experiment as compared to the system with bare carbon paper. Cyclic voltammetry asserted better electrochemical activity of the MFC systems with coated electrodes in the treatment of phenol. The electrochemical impedance spectroscopy data also supported the better performance of biocathodic phenol treatment with lower internal and charge transfer resistances. The scanning electron microscopy images confirmed the active biofilm formation on the electrode surface. The study indicates MFC as a viable option for the treatment of recalcitrant chemical compounds with energy recovery.

Keywords

Microbial fuel cellPhenolCyclic voltammetryPolypyrroleFaraday efficiencyElectrode

Identifiers

PubMed
31956793
Journal
ACS Omega
Year
2019