AI summary

70% confidence

A simplified model of a PEM fuel cell is introduced, and a MIMO dynamic model is considered to control the partial pressures of hydrogen and oxygen. The H∞ robust control strategies are applied to stabilize the system, and a PID controller is developed to adjust the transient state behavior. The results show a significant decrease in the amplitude of alternative disturbances.

Generated by MESSAI extraction pipeline · review against source PDF

Literature priors

Generic MFCRepresentative model
Click to animate flow
loading 3D model…

Representative MFC — matched on the paper’s system type only, not its reactor or geometry.

Distribution

Reported parameters

The author’s reported value (▼) sits on top of the literature distribution from MESS-Parameters. Values outside the band are flagged as outliers.

Coulombic efficiency6%

4 extracted values

View extracted values

Open in lab for full controls, parameter editing, and template overlays.

Open in lab →

What they did

System
MFC

What worked

No outcome metrics extracted yet.

Abstract

In this paper, a simplified model partial pressure of Polymer Electrolyte Membrane Fuel Cell (PEMFC) is introduced. A Multi-Input–Multi-Output (MIMO) dynamic model with two inputs and two outputs is considered, where the inputs are control variable of anode and cathode, and the outputs are partial pressures of hydrogen and oxygen. Initially, the H∞ robust control strategies were applied to stabilize the system. The results show that the amplitude of alternative disturbances is decreased from 10 atm to 0.25 atm. Also, the pressure of each electrode tracks various input pressure profiles with negligible steady-state errors. On the other hand, the electrode pressure does not depend on the variations of constrained electrical current profiles by consumer in the PEM fuel cells. According to unsuitable percent overshoot (P.O.) and settling time of transient model response, system identification techniques are adopted to estimate the system’s transfer functions. After that a PID controller acting as a supervisory controller is properly developed to adjust the transient state behavior of the overall system. This makes the amplitude of alternative disturbances decrease from 10 atm to 0.003 atm. With this controller, the percent overshoot also decreases from 46% to 2% and the settling time (for 2% error) decreases from 0.26 to 0.03 seconds.

Key findings

  • The amplitude of alternative disturbances is decreased from 10 atm to 0.25 atm.
  • The pressure of each electrode tracks various input pressure profiles with negligible steady-state errors.
  • The electrode pressure does not depend on the variations of constrained electrical current profiles by consumer in the PEM fuel cells.

Keywords

Control theory (sociology)Overshoot (microwave communication)Settling timeTransient (computer programming)PID controllerController (irrigation)

Identifiers

Journal
ASME 2010 8th International Fuel Cell Science, Engineering and Technology Conference: Volume 1
Year
2009