Comparison of Various Techniques to Characterize a Single Chamber Microbial Fuel Cell Loaded with Sulfate Reducing Biocatalysts

Abstract

A single-chamber microbial fuel cell (SCMFC) with a carbon supported Pt-cathode for the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR), and loaded with a sulfate reducing bacterial consortium as biocatalyst in the anodic chamber was characterized by polarization by variable resistance (VR) and linear sweep voltammetry (LSV) methods. From VR a whole cell configuration maximum volumetric power of 92.5 mW m⁻³ was attained at a current density of 459 A m⁻³ and voltage of 0.202 V. The LSV method of whole cell configuration gave a higher maximum power density of 197.5 mW m⁻³ at current density of 696 mA m⁻³ at the potential of 0.284V; this disagreement was ascribed to possible reduction of power and potential overshoot with the LSV. There was a fair agreement between internal resistance values of whole cell configuration determined by VR and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS): 2225 and 2307 Ω , respectively. Yet, internal resistance measured by LSV was 30% lower for the whole cell configuration. Both LSV and EIS show the advantage of reduced potential overshoot; yet, EIS provides more detailed information on equivalent circuit of the cell and resistance contributions of the electrodes, electrolyte and membrane. Further cyclic voltammetry tests gave midpoint potential of -0.215 V vs saturated calomel electrode, a value close to those reported for bacterial cytochromes involved in extracellular electron transfer processes. It is concluded that in spite of particular advantages of some techniques over others, the combination of electrochemical methods can be very valuable for shedding light and internal checking of the main characteristics of a microbial fuel cell.

Key findings

• ▸Maximum volumetric power of 92.5 mW m⁻³ was attained at a current density of 459 A m⁻³ and voltage of 0.202 V using VR.
• ▸LSV method gave a higher maximum power density of 197.5 mW m⁻³ at current density of 696 mA m⁻³ at the potential of 0.284V.
• ▸Internal resistance values of whole cell configuration determined by VR and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) showed fair agreement, but LSV measured 30% lower internal resistance.

Keywords

Identifiers

DOI

10.14447/jnmes.v15i3.65

Journal

Journal of New Materials for Electrochemical Systems

Year

2012