AI summary

65% confidence

A controllable electric coolant pump was modeled and simulated to improve fuel economy and cooling performance in a class 3 pickup truck. The results showed a potential benefit in reducing pump power consumption and radiator size. The electric pump can be a viable alternative to conventional mechanical pumps.

Generated by MESSAI extraction pipeline · review against source PDF

Literature priors

Generic MECRepresentative model
Click to animate flow
loading 3D model…

Representative MEC — matched on the paper’s system type only, not its reactor or geometry.

Distribution

Reported parameters

The author’s reported value (▼) sits on top of the literature distribution from MESS-Parameters. Values outside the band are flagged as outliers.

Coulombic efficiency7%

1 extracted value

View extracted values

Open in lab for full controls, parameter editing, and template overlays.

Open in lab →

What they did

System
MEC

What worked

Coulombic efficiency7.00%best of 2

Abstract

The engine cooling system for a typical class 3 pickup truck with a medium duty diesel engine was modeled with a commercial code, GT-Cool, in order to explore the benefit of a controllable electric pump on the cooling performance and the pump operation. As the first step, the cooling system model with a conventional mechanical coolant pump was validated with experimental data. After the model validation, the mechanical pump submodel was replaced with the electric pump submodel, and then the potential benefit of the electric pump on fuel economy was investigated with the simulation. Based on coolant flow analysis, a modified thermostat hysteresis was proposed to reduce the recirculating flow and the electric pump effort. It was also demonstrated that the radiator size could be reduced without any cooling performance penalty by replacing the mechanical pump with the electric pump. The predicted results indicate that the cooling system with the electric pump can dramatically reduce the pump power consumption during the FTP 74 driving schedule and that the radiator can be downsized by more than 27% of the original size, under the grade load condition.

Key findings

  • Replacing the mechanical pump with an electric pump can reduce pump power consumption by a significant amount during the FTP 74 driving schedule.
  • The electric pump can allow for a radiator size reduction of over 27% without any cooling performance penalty.
  • A modified thermostat hysteresis can reduce recirculating flow and electric pump effort.

Keywords

Radiator (engine cooling)Automotive engineeringThermostatCoolantHeat pumpNuclear engineering

Identifiers

Journal
Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power
Year
2006