AI summary

70% confidence

A study compared the performance of two fuel cell architectures: Catalyst Coated Diffusion Media (CCDM) and Catalyst Coated Membrane (CCM). The results showed a 5-10% decrease in through-plane thermal resistance for CCDM compared to CCM. This suggests improved thermal and electrical contact resistances in CCDM.

Generated by MESSAI extraction pipeline · review against source PDF

Generic MFCRepresentative model
Click to animate flow
loading 3D model…

Representative MFC — matched on the paper’s system type only, not its reactor or geometry.

Extraction

Reported parameters

8 extracted values

View extracted values

Open in lab for full controls, parameter editing, and template overlays.

Open in lab →

What they did

System
MFC

What worked

No outcome metrics extracted yet.

Abstract

Two fuel cell architectures, differing only by the surfaces onto which the electrodes were applied, have been analyzed to determine the root causes of dissimilarities in performance. The basic proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) is comprised of the proton transporting membrane, platinum-containing anode and cathode electrodes, porous carbon fiber gas diffusion media (GDM), and flow fields which deliver the reactant hydrogen and air flows. As no optimal cell design currently exists, there is a degree of latitude regarding component assembly and structure. Catalyst coated diffusion media (CCDM) refers to a cell architecture option where the electrode layers are coated on the GDM layers and then hot-pressed to the membrane. Catalyst coated membrane (CCM) refers to an architecture where the electrodes are transferred directly onto the membrane. A cell with CCDM architecture has tightly bonded interfaces throughout the assembly which can result in lower thermal and electrical contact resistances. Considering the fuel cell as a 1-D thermal system, the through-plane thermal resistance was observed to decrease by 5–10% when comparing CCDM to CCM architectures. This suggests the thermal contact resistance at the electrode interfaces was significantly reduced in the hot-press process. In addition, the electrical contact resistances between the electrode and GDM were observed to be significantly reduced with a CCDM architecture. This study shows that these effects, which have a potential to increase performance, can be attributed to the hot-press lamination process and use of CCDM architecture.

Key findings

  • CCDM architecture resulted in lower thermal and electrical contact resistances
  • Through-plane thermal resistance decreased by 5-10% in CCDM compared to CCM
  • Improved thermal and electrical contact resistances in CCDM

Keywords

Proton exchange membrane fuel cellElectrodeAnodeCathodeContact resistanceMembrane electrode assembly

Identifiers

Journal
Volume 9: Heat Transfer, Fluid Flows, and Thermal Systems, Parts A, B and C
Year
2008