AI summary

65% confidence

A comparative study of electricity generation from industrial wastewater via Microbial Fuel Cell (MFC) found that wastewater from Factory A produced higher voltage than that from Factory B, with a 41% and 82.4% difference in tests 1 and 2, respectively.

Generated by MESSAI extraction pipeline · review against source PDF

Literature priors

Generic MFCRepresentative model
Click to animate flow
loading 3D model…

Representative MFC — matched on the paper’s system type only, not its reactor or geometry.

Distribution

Reported parameters

The author’s reported value (▼) sits on top of the literature distribution from MESS-Parameters. Values outside the band are flagged as outliers.

Coulombic efficiency1%

5 extracted values

View extracted values

Open in lab for full controls, parameter editing, and template overlays.

Open in lab →

What they did

System
MFC

What worked

Coulombic efficiency1.00%best of 2

Abstract

The present study presents a comparison of the electricity generation from industrial wastewater via Microbial Fuel Cell (MFC). Four experimental setups with four types of MFC were developed for this study. For MFC 1, 75% of wastewater from Factory A added to a fixed concentration of cow manure to obtain a solution of 600ml in the anodic chamber while adding distilled water into the cathodic chamber. Contrastingly, for MFC 2, 75% of wastewater from Factory A was added to a fixed concentration of cow manure to obtain a solution of 600ml in the anodic chamber, whereas distilled water mixed with 15g of potassium ferricyanide was added to the cathodic chamber. For MFC 3, a similar setup was made as in MFC 1 though it utilizes wastewater from Factory B. MFC 4 in return replicated the setup of MFC 2, yet the wastewater was collected from Factory B. Two (2) tests were conducted where Test 1 was to compare the voltage readings from MFC 1 and MFC 3, while Test 2 was for MFC 2 and MFC 4. It was observed that the voltage produced by the wastewater from Factory A was higher than that of voltage produced from Factory B by 41% in test 1 and 82.4% in test 2. Interestingly, the addition of potassium ferricyanide further increased the voltage by 63.17% when comparing between MFCs 4 and 3, while 111% for MFCs 2 and 1, respectively. Hence, it can be deduced that the addition of an external electron acceptor such as the potassium ferricyanide greatly increases the voltage produced. For future studies, other types of external electron acceptors could be tested in identifying its potential in improving the capability of the MFC.Keywords: microbial fuel cell, natural mixes, isoelectronic microbes, ecological concern

Key findings

  • [object Object]
  • [object Object]
  • [object Object]

Keywords

Microbial fuel cellWastewaterDistilled waterPulp and paper industryPotassium ferricyanideAnode

Identifiers

Journal
Platform : A Journal of Engineering
Year
2020