Back to research
Corrigendum to “Performance of plug flow microbial fuel cell (PF-MFC) and complete mixing microbial fuel cell (CM-MFC) for wastewater treatment and power generation” [Int Journal Hydrogen Energy 38 (2013) 5383–5388]
Udayarka Karra, Elizabeth Troop, Michael Curtis, Karl Scheible +3
3D Interactive ModelAI Enhanced· 70%
SystemMFC
AI summary
70% confidenceThis corrigendum corrects errors in a previous study comparing the performance of plug flow microbial fuel cells (PF-MFCs) and complete mixing microbial fuel cells (CM-MFCs) for wastewater treatment and power generation.
Generated by MESSAI extraction pipeline · review against source PDF
Generic MFCRepresentative model
Click to animate flow
loading 3D model…
Representative MFC — matched on the paper’s system type only, not its reactor or geometry.
Open in lab for full controls, parameter editing, and template overlays.
Open in lab →What they did
- System
- MFC
What worked
No outcome metrics extracted yet.
Abstract
Key findings
- PF-MFCs and CM-MFCs have similar performance in terms of wastewater treatment and power generation
- PF-MFCs have a higher power density compared to CM-MFCs
- CM-MFCs have a higher COD removal efficiency compared to PF-MFCs
Keywords
Microbial fuel cellSpark plugPlug flowINTHydrogen fuelWastewater
Identifiers
- Journal
- International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
- Year
- 2015