AI summary

92% confidence

This is a critical comment on a bibliometric analysis by Li et al. (2019) examining bioelectrochemical systems for groundwater remediation. Ho argues that Li et al. employed inappropriate search strategies and methodology, including imprecise keyword searches that retrieved irrelevant documents and failure to filter results using article front pages (title, abstract, author keywords). The analysis reveals that 95% of retrieved documents were unrelated to the stated topic, and top-cited articles lacked any of the specified search terms, demonstrating fundamental flaws in the original bibliometric approach.

Generated by MESSAI extraction pipeline · review against source PDF

Extraction

Reported parameters

No values extracted from this paper yet.

No 3D model is mapped to this paper yet. Parameter ranges above still place reported values on the literature distribution.

What they did

System
REVIEW

What worked

No outcome metrics extracted yet.

Abstract

Li et al. (2019) used inappropriate searching words and method to publish a bibliometric paper in Water. The results show a huge difference from the results by using an appropriate method. This comment points out each of problems.

Keywords

GroundwaterEnvironmental remediationFront (military)

Identifiers

Journal
Water
Year
2020