Performance improvement of solid oxide fuel cell system fed by methane
, Supawat Vivanpatarakij
AI summary
90% confidenceMES research in membrane, bacteria. The research focuses on the improvement of methane-fuelled solid oxide fuel cell system. Thr...
Generated by MESSAI extraction pipeline · review against source PDF
No 3D model is mapped to this paper yet. Parameter ranges above still place reported values on the literature distribution.
Abstract
The research focuses on the improvement of methane-fuelled solid oxide fuel cell system. Three improvements of the system were considered: 1) Operating under a non-uniform potential operation (SOFC-NUP), 2) Implementing a membrane reactor to the SOFC system (SOFC-MR) and 3) Integrating a CaO-CO₂ acceptor with the SOFC system (SOFC-CaO). For SOFC-NUP, the optimum split ratios of Sp,1 = 0.55 and Sp,2 = 0.45 was found to improve power density as high as 9.2%. In addition, the increase in the number of separated section (n) of the cell could increase the achieved maximum power density but less pronounced after n > 3. For SOFC-MR, an SOFC system integrated with a palladium membrane reactor operating at different modes; i.e., high pressure compressor (MR-HPC), vacuum pump (MR-V) and combined high pressure compressor and vacuum pump (MR-HPC-V) was considered. The power density of the SOFC was improved, depending on the increasing hydrogen recovery (). At high electrical efficiency, the SOFC-MR system became more attractive than the conventional system. It was found that the MR-HPC-V was the best operation mode among MR-SOFC systems. For the CaO-CO₂ acceptor SOFC systems, the CO₂ capture efficiency (Ec) depends on fresh feed CaO (F0), recycled CaO (FR) and amount of CO₂ ¬fed through. The CaO-CO₂ SOFC systems (i.e. CaO-After-Burner, CaO-After-SOFC and CaO-Before-SOFC) were compared with the conventional SOFC. Only CaO-Before-SOFC can improve SOFC performance which depends on both CO2 capture efficiency (Ec) and fuel utilization (Uf). The CaO-SOFC system can operate at lower cost than the conventional SOFC. The total added cost/reduced CO2 ($.mol-1) are in the sequence of the CaO-After-Burner > CaO-After-SOFC > CaO-Before-SOFC. Unfortunately, CaO-Before-SOFC can not reduce CO2 more than 40%. When the CO₂ reduction was required more than 40%, the CaO-After-SOFC was a suitable choice for the SOFC-CaO system.
Keywords
Identifiers
- Journal
- Unknown journal
- Year
- 2007