Effect of different carbon sources on sulfate reduction and microbial community structure in bioelectrochemical systems
Jing jing Pan, Luyu Tan, Qingqing Fan, Xiangyang Cao +3
AI summary
85% confidenceMEC research with standard focus on standard. Abstract Microbial electrolysis cells (MECs) have rapidly developed into a promising technolog...
Generated by MESSAI extraction pipeline · review against source PDF
Literature priors
Representative dual-chamber MEC — matched on the paper’s reported configuration, not its exact geometry.
Reported parameters
The author’s reported value (▼) sits on top of the literature distribution from MESS-Parameters. Values outside the band are flagged as outliers.
11 extracted values
View extracted valuesOpen in lab for full controls, parameter editing, and template overlays.
Open in lab →What they did
- System
- MEC
- Substrate
- pure compound
- Inoculum
- sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB)
What worked
No outcome metrics extracted yet.
Abstract
Abstract Microbial electrolysis cells (MECs) have rapidly developed into a promising technology to treat sulfate-rich wastewater that lacks electron donors. However, little is known regarding the effect of different carbon sources on the microbial community structure bioelectrochemical systems. This study sought to investigate the effect of different carbon sources (NaHCO 3 , ethanol, and acetate were employed as sole carbon source respectively) on the performance of sulfate-reducing biocathodes. The sulfate reduction efficiency enhanced by the bioelectrochemical systems was 8.09%−11.57% higher than that of open-circuit reference experiments. Furthermore, the optimum carbon source was ethanol with a maximum sulfate reduction rate of 170 mg L −1 d −1 in the bioelectrochemical systems. The different carbon sources induced significant differences in sulfate reduction efficiency as demonstrated by the application of a micro-electrical field. The dominant sulfate-reducing bacteria that use NaHCO 3 and acetate as carbon sources were Desulfobacter and Desulfobulbus , whereas those that use ethanol as carbon source were Desulfomicrobium and Desulfovibrio . Our results suggest that ethanol is a more suitable carbon source for sulfate reduction in bioelectrochemical systems.
Keywords
Identifiers
- Journal
- Research Square
- Year
- 2022