AI summary
90% confidenceMES research in electrode, performance. This chapter addresses how The New York Times challenged the long-held claims of...
Generated by MESSAI extraction pipeline · review against source PDF
Reported parameters
No values extracted from this paper yet.
No 3D model is mapped to this paper yet. Parameter ranges above still place reported values on the literature distribution.
Abstract
This chapter addresses how The New York Times challenged the long-held claims of Arizona officials that their state was entitled to a portion of the Colorado River by rights, a claim recently upheld by the Supreme Court. The paper also argued that Arizona's attempt to realize those claims endangered the Colorado River and the Grand Canyon itself. Transforming the flowing energy of water into flowing electricity, the Times suggested, was not in the national interest. Such critiques of Arizona's growth emerged in the wake of the Interior Department's development of the Pacific Southwest Water Plan, a plan designed in 1963 to realize Arizona's Colorado River claims. The critiques emerged from several different conservationist groups, but most powerfully from the Sierra Club, which was gradually changing the description of its politics from “conservation” to “environmentalism” and assuming a far more public voice in disputes over the proper use of public lands.
Keywords
Identifiers
- Journal
- Power Lines
- Year
- 2014