Two‐compartment versus one‐compartment processing: Comparison in respect to facility design and productivity for microbial recombinant protein production
Mohammadhadi Jazini, Christoph Herwig
AI summary
95% confidenceInternational MES research in biotechnology with focus on biotechnology. One‐compartment processing (OCP) includes cultivation of a microorganism in a single bioreactor. It is conventio...
Generated by MESSAI extraction pipeline · review against source PDF
Reported parameters
No values extracted from this paper yet.
No 3D model is mapped to this paper yet. Parameter ranges above still place reported values on the literature distribution.
Abstract
One‐compartment processing (OCP) includes cultivation of a microorganism in a single bioreactor. It is conventionally used for the production of heterologous proteins in Pichia pastori s. However, two‐compartment processing (TCP) (cultivation in a single reactor coupled to a plug flow reactor) has been proposed as a novel approach for the production of recombinant HRP. All possible process modes must be evaluated when a process is being designed. In this work, a simple methodology was used to evaluate different production scenarios. The methodology includes sizing of the main equipment to produce a certain amount of product. The calculations showed that TCP needed 40% smaller reactor volume, 20% smaller chromatography column diameter, and 40% less buffer consumption than OCP for the annual production of 8 kg HRP. In turn, implementation of TCP into a process, which was designed based on OCP, could increase the annual production up to 9 kg. In addition, it could improve the protein quality by factor of two. The methodology, presented in this work, provides a straightforward procedure to evaluate different production scenarios in terms of investment and revenue. It confirmed TCP as an attractive production mode for HRP.
Keywords
Identifiers
- Journal
- Engineering in Life Sciences
- Year
- 2014