MESSAI.iO
Platform
  • Atlas
  • Research Intelligence
  • Your Report Card
  • Knowledge Graph
  • Protocol Graph
  • Parameter Catalog
  • Microbe Catalog
  • Meta-Analysis
  • Hunter
  • Insights
  • Manuscript Review
Lab
  • 3D Laboratory
  • Model Catalog
  • MESS Explorer
  • Parameter Sweep
  • Predictions
  • Experiments
  • Virtual Sensor
  • Methodology
Use cases
  • For Researchers
  • For Companies
  • For Institutions
Learn
  • The Science
  • Manual
  • Whitepaper
  • Use with AI assistants
About

Language

  • Englishen
  • Deutschde

Platform

  • Atlas
  • Research Intelligence
  • Your Report Card
  • Knowledge Graph
  • Protocol Graph
  • Parameter Catalog
  • Microbe Catalog
  • Meta-Analysis
  • Hunter
  • Insights
  • Manuscript Review

Lab

  • 3D Laboratory
  • Model Catalog
  • MESS Explorer
  • Parameter Sweep
  • Predictions
  • Experiments
  • Virtual Sensor
  • Resource Recovery Demo

Company

  • About
  • For Researchers
  • For Companies
  • For Institutions
  • Whitepaper
  • Manual
  • API Docs
  • Use with AI assistants

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Proof
  • Contact

MESSAI · Microbial Electrochemical Systems AI · © 2026

Every number on this site traces to a source file — /proof

Library

Research Library

Discover insights from thousands of peer-reviewed papers on microbial electrochemical systems

Results

Research Papers

(23,598)

Local PDF 04c33c27e105

· 0

Score: 0%Verified
View Details →

Local PDF 04b95edb0837

· 0

Score: 0%Verified
View Details →

Local PDF 04a000bb5487

· 0

Score: 0%Verified
View Details →

Local PDF 03b402886af5

· 0

Score: 0%Verified
View Details →

Local PDF 039e18bee46d

· 0

Score: 0%Verified
View Details →

Local PDF 03516f3f03ec

· 0

Score: 0%Verified
View Details →

Local PDF 033470a8cb9d

· 0

Score: 0%Verified
View Details →

Local PDF 031a044a2574

· 0

Score: 0%Verified
View Details →

Local PDF 02e2ae7e383f

· 0

Score: 0%Verified
View Details →

Local PDF 02b6a32e55d6

· 0

Score: 0%Verified
View Details →

Local PDF 0274f03ff6be

· 0

Score: 0%Verified
View Details →

Local PDF 025984a3fe87

· 0

Score: 0%Verified
View Details →

Local PDF 02381a27aa46

· 0

Score: 0%Verified
View Details →

Local PDF 021214d49ea8

· 0

Score: 0%Verified
View Details →

Local PDF 0201fea5f550

· 0

Score: 0%Verified
View Details →

Local PDF 01c7752c0246

· 0

Score: 0%Verified
View Details →

Local PDF 018d28d47e49

· 0

Score: 0%Verified
View Details →

Local PDF 0130637cd5bc

· 0

Score: 0%Verified
View Details →

Local PDF 00d2cea0318d

· 0

Score: 0%Verified
View Details →

Local PDF 00c6f1288474

· 0

Score: 0%Verified
View Details →

Local PDF 0093bd131bbf

· 0

Score: 0%Verified
View Details →

Local PDF 0040654904b8

· 0

Score: 0%Verified
View Details →

Microbial desalination cell technology: A review and a case study

· 2014

Score: 0%Verified
View Details →

Performance of a continuous flow microbial reverse-electrodialysis electrolysis cell using a non-buffered substrate and catholyte effluent addition

· 2017

Score: 0%Verified
View Details →

Microbial Reverse-Electrodialysis Electrolysis and Chemical-Production Cell for H<sub>2</sub> Production and CO<sub>2</sub> Sequestration

· 2014

sequestration.

Score: 0%Verified
View Details →

Microbial reverse-electrodialysis chemical-production cell for acid and alkali production

· 2013

Score: 0%Verified
View Details →

Hydrogen production from continuous flow, microbial reverse-electrodialysis electrolysis cells treating fermentation wastewater

· 2015

Score: 0%Verified
View Details →

Performance of Microbial Reverse-Electrodialysis Cells for Power Generation at Different External Resistance

· 2020

In this study, the effect of external resistance on the microbial reverse-electrodialysis cell (MRC) performance using organic-rich wastewater as an electron donor was examined. The optimum of external resistance was determined to be 300 Ω. In such condition, the power density of 1.53 ± 0.198 W/m 2 , substrate removal of 52 ± 2.3%, Coulombic efficiency of 70 ± 2.6%, energy recovery of 3.0 ± 0.4%, and energy efficiency of 53 ± 7.1% were obtained in the MRC. The differences in power density at different external resistances were mainly due to the changes in internal resistance and ion flux efficiency in the MRC. The external resistance affected substrate removal and Coulombic efficiency through the length of batch cycle time, and current density exchanged as well as the Tafel slope. Furthermore, the proper external resistance applied to the reactor created high power production; thus, high energy efficiency and energy recovery were achieved. These results demonstrated that selecting proper external resistance was an essential key for a successful MRC operational.

Score: 0%Verified
View Details →

Hydrogen production from inexhaustible supplies of fresh and salt water using microbial reverse-electrodialysis electrolysis cells

· 2011

There is a tremendous source of entropic energy available from the salinity difference between river water and seawater, but this energy has yet to be efficiently captured and stored. Here we demonstrate that H(2) can be produced in a single process by capturing the salinity driven energy along with organic matter degradation using exoelectrogenic bacteria. Only five pairs of seawater and river water cells were sandwiched between an anode, containing exoelectrogenic bacteria, and a cathode, forming a microbial reverse-electrodialysis electrolysis cell. Exoelectrogens added an electrical potential from acetate oxidation and reduced the anode overpotential, while the reverse electrodialysis stack contributed 0.5-0.6 V at a salinity ratio (seawater:river water) of 50. The H(2) production rate increased from 0.8 to 1.6 m(3)-H(2)/m(3)-anolyte/day for seawater and river water flow rates ranging from 0.1 to 0.8 mL/ min. H(2) recovery, the ratio of electrons used for H(2) evolution to electrons released by substrate oxidation, ranged from 72% to 86%. Energy efficiencies, calculated from changes in salinities and the loss of organic matter, were 58% to 64%. By using a relatively small reverse electrodialysis stack (11 membranes), only ~1% of the produced energy was needed for pumping water. Although Pt was used on the cathode in these tests, additional tests with a nonprecious metal catalyst (MoS(2)) demonstrated H(2) production at a rate of 0.8 m(3)/m(3)/d and an energy efficiency of 51%. These results show that pure H(2) gas can efficiently be produced from virtually limitless supplies of seawater and river water, and biodegradable organic matter.

Score: 0%Verified

Impedance characteristics and polarization behaviors of microbial reverse-electrodialysis cells with changes in effective membrane area, intermembrane distance, and flow rates of salinity gradient waters

· 2024

Score: 0%Verified
View Details →

Blue energy meets green energy in microbial reverse electrodialysis cells: Recent advancements and prospective

· 2023

Score: 0%Verified
View Details →

Minimal RED Cell Pairs Markedly Improve Electrode Kinetics and Power Production in Microbial Reverse Electrodialysis Cells

· 2013

Power production from microbial reverse electrodialysis cell (MRC) electrodes is substantially improved compared to microbial fuel cells (MFCs) by using ammonium bicarbonate (AmB) solutions in multiple RED cell pair stacks and the cathode chamber. Reducing the number of RED membranes pairs while maintaining enhanced electrode performance could help to reduce capital costs. We show here that using only a single RED cell pair (CP), created by operating the cathode in concentrated AmB, dramatically increased power production normalized to cathode area from both acetate (Acetate: from 0.9 to 3.1 W/m²-cat) and wastewater (WW: 0.3 to 1.7 W/m²), by reducing solution and charge transfer resistances at the cathode. A second RED cell pair increased RED stack potential and reduced anode charge transfer resistance, further increasing power production (Acetate: 4.2 W/m²; WW: 1.9 W/m²). By maintaining near optimal electrode power production with fewer membranes, power densities normalized to total membrane area for the 1-CP (Acetate: 3.1 W/m²-mem; WW: 1.7 W/m²) and 2-CP (Acetate: 1.3 W/m²-mem; WW: 0.6 W/m²) reactors were much higher than previous MRCs (0.3-0.5 W/m²-mem with acetate). While operating at peak power, the rate of wastewater COD removal, normalized to reactor volume, was 30-50 times higher in 1-CP and 2-CP MRCs than that in a single chamber MFC. These findings show that even a single cell pair AmB RED stack can significantly enhance electrical power production and wastewater treatment.

Score: 0%Verified

Cathodic abatement of Cr(VI) in water by microbial reverse-electrodialysis cells

· 2015

Score: 0%Verified
View Details →

Energy Capture from Thermolytic Solutions in Microbial Reverse-Electrodialysis Cells

· 2012

Reverse electrodialysis allows for the capture of energy from salinity gradients between salt and fresh waters, but potential applications are currently limited to coastal areas and the need for a large number of membrane pairs. Using salt solutions that could be continuously regenerated with waste heat (≥40°C) and conventional technologies would allow much wider applications of salinity-gradient power production. We used reverse electrodialysis ion-exchange membrane stacks in microbial reverse-electrodialysis cells to efficiently capture salinity-gradient energy from ammonium bicarbonate salt solutions. The maximum power density using acetate reached 5.6 watts per square meter of cathode surface area, which was five times that produced without the dialysis stack, and 3.0 ± 0.05 watts per square meter with domestic wastewater. Maximum energy recovery with acetate reached 30 ± 0.5%.

Score: 0%Verified
View Details →

Struvite recovery from microbial fuel cells treating different nutrient-rich wastewaters

· 2024

Score: 0%Verified
View Details →

Nutrients recovery by coupled bioreactor of heterotrophic ammonia assimilation and microbial fuel cell in saline wastewater

· 2024

Score: 0%Verified
View Details →

Ligno-cellulosic materials as air-water separators in low-tech microbial fuel cells for nutrients recovery

· 2017

Score: 0%Verified
View Details →

Bioelectricity generation from human urine and simultaneous nutrient recovery: Role of Microbial Fuel Cells

· 2021

Score: 0%Verified
View Details →

Nutrient removal and recovery from wastewater by microbial fuel cell-based systems – A review

· 2022

Microbial fuel cell (MFC) is a green innovative technology that can be employed for nutrient removal/recovery as well as for energy production from wastewater. This paper summarizes the recent advances in the use of MFCs for nutrient removal/recovery. Different configurations of MFCs used for nutrient removal are first described. Different types of nutrient removal/recovery mechanisms such as precipitation, biological uptake by microalgae, nitrification, denitrification and ammonia stripping occurring in MFCs are discussed. Recovery of nutrients as struvite or cattiite by precipitation, as microalgal biomass and as ammonium salts are common. This review shows that while higher nutrient removal/recovery is possible with MFCs and their modifications compared to other techniques as indicated by many laboratory studies, field-scale studies and optimization of operational parameters are needed to develop efficient MFCs for nutrient removal and recovery and electricity generation from different types of wastewaters.

Score: 0%Verified
View Details →

Microbial fuel cell for nutrient recovery and electricity generation from municipal wastewater under different ammonium concentrations

· 2019

Score: 0%Verified
View Details →
PreviousPage 36 of 590Next
View Details →
View Details →
15,361
Total Papers
27
Years of Research
0
System Types