Forschungsdaten – Titel und Zusammenfassungen von Publikationen, extrahierte Daten und Katalogeinträge – erscheinen in ihrer Originalsprache Englisch.
Jinfeng Hu, Longjun Xu, Qi Jing, Miao Xie +1
This study compares chemical-cathode MFC (CMFC) and aerobic bio-cathode MFC (ABMFC) for treating aged landfill leachate over 45 days. CMFC achieved higher voltage (699.0 mV) and power density (197.7 mW/m³) but lower COD removal (56.5%), while ABMFC produced lower electrical output (459.4 mV, 147.6 mW/m³) but superior contaminant removal (64.3% COD, 58.1% ammonia nitrogen). Both systems demonstrated dual functionality for energy recovery and wastewater treatment, though neither achieved emission standards alone.
Erstellt von der MESSAI-Extraktionspipeline · mit dem Quell-PDF abgleichen
Noch keine extrahierten Parameter – fordern Sie eine KI-Extraktion an, um diese Publikation mit den Literaturverteilungen zu vergleichen.
Öffnen Sie das Modell im Labor, um alle Steuerelemente, die Parameterbearbeitung und Vorlagen-Overlays zu nutzen.
Im Labor öffnen →Noch keine Ergebniskennzahlen extrahiert.
The effect of cathode type on contaminant removal efficiency and electricity production in disposing leachate was investigated in a self-assembled microbial fuel cell (MFC). When the landfill leachate was treated with the chemical-cathode MFC (CMFC) and aerobic bio-cathode MFC (ABMFC), the maximum output voltages were 699.0 mV and 459.4 mV, the maximum output powers were 197.7 mW m -3 and 147.6 mW m -3 , and the internal resistances were 900 and 700 , respectively. After running the MFCs for 45 days, the COD removal ratios of CMFC and ABMFC were 56.5 % and 64.3 %, the Coulombic efficiencies were 14.3 % and 17.1 %, and the ammonia nitrogen removal ratios were 53.8 % and 58.1 %, respectively.